<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: [Year in film: 2009 roundup]</title>
	<atom:link href="http://librarinth.net/letterboxed/2009/12/31/year-in-film-2009-roundup/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://librarinth.net/letterboxed/2009/12/31/year-in-film-2009-roundup/</link>
	<description>the language of film is universal</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2011 01:17:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Caitlin</title>
		<link>http://librarinth.net/letterboxed/2009/12/31/year-in-film-2009-roundup/#comment-630</link>
		<dc:creator>Caitlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 04:35:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://librarinth.net/letterboxed/2009/12/31/year-in-film-2009-roundup/#comment-630</guid>
		<description>I, like Rachel, am also still getting my Google Reader feed under control.  Finally.

I enjoy your categories. I especially agree with your &quot;other favorites&quot; list, and the one right above it. I haven&#039;t seen A Serious Man yet, but the rest, I loved!

I really can&#039;t believe I haven&#039;t seen Hurt Locker yet.  This week, hopefully!  

And I&#039;m scared to see Precious, although I should.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I, like Rachel, am also still getting my Google Reader feed under control.  Finally.</p>
<p>I enjoy your categories. I especially agree with your &#8220;other favorites&#8221; list, and the one right above it. I haven&#8217;t seen A Serious Man yet, but the rest, I loved!</p>
<p>I really can&#8217;t believe I haven&#8217;t seen Hurt Locker yet.  This week, hopefully!  </p>
<p>And I&#8217;m scared to see Precious, although I should.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rachel</title>
		<link>http://librarinth.net/letterboxed/2009/12/31/year-in-film-2009-roundup/#comment-629</link>
		<dc:creator>Rachel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 22:20:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://librarinth.net/letterboxed/2009/12/31/year-in-film-2009-roundup/#comment-629</guid>
		<description>(I am finally catching up on my google reader - nothing like end of the year posts halfway into January!)

I am still bitter that my dad rejected &quot;Young Victoria&quot; for our Christmas Eve movie - for no reason that I could understand, since he loves that sort of movie. Not that I can&#039;t see it on my own, but I feel like it would have been a great choice.

Also, I have heard only good things about &quot;Up in the Air&quot; from people I trust, and I am very excited to eventually get around to seeing it. :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(I am finally catching up on my google reader &#8211; nothing like end of the year posts halfway into January!)</p>
<p>I am still bitter that my dad rejected &#8220;Young Victoria&#8221; for our Christmas Eve movie &#8211; for no reason that I could understand, since he loves that sort of movie. Not that I can&#8217;t see it on my own, but I feel like it would have been a great choice.</p>
<p>Also, I have heard only good things about &#8220;Up in the Air&#8221; from people I trust, and I am very excited to eventually get around to seeing it. :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

