[The Illusionist]
I had intended to just Netflix The Illusionist, but a friend suggested going last night and so. Here we are.
Without spoilers I will say that Edward Norton was particularly good, especially as a good deal of his performance was sans dialogue, and that Paul Giamatti was excellent as always. I tend to enjoy things having to do with more or less Victorian magic and mediums, so the movie had me there. Also, it was beautifully shot for the most part.
The only thing that had made me doubt myself was the timeline. I’m still unclear on how long everything was supposed to take. Eisenheim mourns, buys a theater, etc, and in all of that time no one notices that her body has disappeared? And no one mucks out the stall?
And in the end, an innocent man kills himself. An innocent man with anger management issues, true, but I don’t think he deserved to die for that.
(I have a lot of video & DVD things to post, as usual, but they’ll have to wait. I have a pot of coffee & two discs worth of “House”.)
7 Comments
This entry is filed under Uncategorized.
You can also follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
Or perhaps you're just looking for the trackback and/or the permalink.


dude, that ending definitely went on too long, and was too heavyhanded. I did not need the explanation and thought it weakened the film.
I really did like the score, though.
Not really related, but have you read “Affinity” by Sarah Waters (the medium love grabbed me)? I think it’s her best book so far, and you might enjoy it too. Or not. ;)
I have! I almost referenced it in this post. It’s my favorite of hers because of the medium stuff. Yay! (It always seemed to me that a lot of people weren’t big on that one, so it makes me happy when it turns out other people like it.)
So it is worth seeing, you think?
Netflix, maybe.
Fair. Especially since I just read your spoilers. ;)
Hee! I mean, a lot of people really seemed to like it, so I don’t know :)